Methodology

How a dossier is made

The evidence chain, the four indicators, entity resolution, what is verified and what is company-stated, and how errors are corrected. Published so that anyone can check our work.

ClaimDirector appointed 14 March 2025 (M. Chen, resident of Singapore)verified1Source2Original location3Document date4Retrieved5Entity match6Verification7ContradictionsACRA Bizfile profile · page 2 · dated 2025-03-18 · retrieved 2026-10-20 · UEN 201912345A · reviewed by analyst · none foundEvery important claim opens to this chain. A number without a chain is not shown.

The chain

Source → original location → document date → retrieval date → entity match → verification status → contradictions. Every important claim opens to it. Numbers without a chain are not shown. Where a source has limits (a court database that publishes selected decisions; a registry that lists shareholders but not controllers), the limit is written on the claim.

Statuses

  • Verified: matched to an official or primary source by an analyst
  • Partial: source searched with stated limits, or through a partner
  • Company-stated: supplied by the company, not independently verified
  • Licensed / supplied: licensed data or a restricted document
  • Open question: unresolved and listed
  • Contradiction: sources disagree; both shown

Four indicators

Completeness, freshness, open questions, human review. We do not publish a single trust score, because a number that cannot be explained is worth less than a list that can. Low data is not shown as high risk; no negative information found is not shown as no risk.

Review

An analyst reviews every brief before release: entity match confirmed, contradictions resolved or recorded, open questions listed, reviewer named and dated. Phase-2 and phase-3 jurisdictions use partner offices for litigation and registry work and say so.

Entity resolution · Review and feedback policy · Corrections and appeals · Independence and disclosure · Data sourcing and licensing